Economist calls Ex President Jonathan an 'ineffectual buffoon, Nigerians react.

No Comments

Ex Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan
Nigerians have communicated shock at the Economist for marking the nation's past president, Goodluck Jonathan, as an 'inadequate clown.'
In an article titled "crude Tactics: Cheap oil is causing a currency crisis in Nigeria. Banning imports is no solution ", distributed in The Economist last Thursday, the magazine, while
examining the financial approaches of President Muhammadu Buhari, had composed that "In the eight months since Mr. Buhari landed at Aso Rock, the presidential burrows, the desperate jihadists of Boko Haram have been pushed once again into the shrubbery along Nigeria's fringes.
"The administration has taken action against debasement, which had thrived under the past president, Goodluck Jonathan, an inadequate joker who let legislators and their colleagues fill their pockets with exemption."
In irate responses on online networking, larger part of Nigerians communicated their disappointment with the tag on a previous president of Africa's most crowded country.
Composing on her Twitter handle, Nigerian creator, Molara Wood expressed, "Wondered about the verbal horseplay of @TheEconomist. It's verging on like it's close to home. I thought you individuals had style guides.#Inappropriate."
Likewise, composing on his Twitter handle, @Olumicome2, a Nigerian, Obamide, said, "I believe it's wrong that the market analyst depicted Jonathan as an inadequate Buffon. It's so wrong to call our ex-president that
In another response, A Twitter client, Ogbiji Nyiam, said, "The Economist reference of Jonathan as "an insufficient Buffon" is uncalled and saucy."
Also, composing on his Facebook page, one Ismail Aniemu said each Nigerian ought to be agonized over any slanderous portrayal of our pioneers by the western media.
"Portraying Jonathan as an 'Insufficient Buffoon' is not a decent testimonial for us originating from a compelling production, The Economist. Nigerians ought to mutually look for methods for maintaining a strategic distance from humiliations of this sort in future. How could we have been able to we get a GEJ to lead us in any case?" he composed.
Another Nigerian, Adedayo Adesoji, likewise communicated his reservations on his Facebook page.
He composed, "Regardless of the way that I have never for once fancied the sort of President Jonathan's style of administration, I take special case to the Economist's position alluding to the Nigerian quick past President as an insufficient clown! It is the tallness of lack of regard to the identity of our previous President! On the off chance that genuinely the Economist stooped so low to regurgitate out this affront, then the above all around regarded news stage has brought down its expert standard and conveyed universal news coverage to a condition of notoriety! I am dreadfully baffled in the Economist if genuinely it wrote such a distribution!"
Additionally, in his Facebook post, a Nigerian, Ugo Chikezie, said the mark by The Economist was injurious.
"For me, I totally concur that GEJ was inadequate, however I don't exactly concur that he is a jokester. We all know GEJ fizzled woefully as president, yet I think calling him a clown is pointless. Individuals ought to figure out how to condemn without being oppressive," He composed on his Facebook page.
Nonetheless, Aliyu Abubakar Zaria said, "So while Jonathan was caught up with purchasing grants in USA and Switzerland, attempting to fragrance his rotten years as president, the Economist depicted him as an "insufficient Buffon, who let government officials and their associates fill their pockets with exemption". Some Nigerians are now furious, depicting the portrayal of 'a previous president of a nation' as an "inadequate bozo" as 'prejudice'. Is the Economist wrong in this affirmation or they are simply expressing the self-evident?"
Source: punch
Next PostNewer Post Previous PostOlder Post Home


Post a Comment

To my amazing readers, it's all about what you think, Please share your thoughts.